How consumers value retailer's return policy leniency levers: An empirical investigation

Due to the ongoing and dramatic growth in the volume of consumer returns, retailers continue to struggle with the trade-off in returns service strategies between implementing stricter return policies to lower operational costs and environmental footprint versus providing customers with lenient return policies to positively stimulate customers' value perceptions and patronage intentions. This paper argues that effective management of this trade-off requires a deep understanding of the process through which consumers perceive, evaluate, and respond to return policies that vary in terms of leniency across five key dimensions identified in the literature: monetary, time, effort, scope, and exchange. To this end, we theorize on a cognitive process model and empirically test the model using randomized experiments with diverse consumer samples. By viewing each of the five leniency dimensions as returns service design levers, we examine (1) how a retailer's return policy leniency across different levers impacts a consumer's intention to purchase from a retailer, through the influence of leniency on the perceptions regarding returns service quality and transaction costs that jointly form perceived returns service value, and (2) how different leniency levers are compared in terms of their impacts. We find significant heterogeneity in the effectiveness of different leniency levers in influencing consumers' purchase intentions through increased perceived service quality, reduced perceived transaction costs, and subsequently increased perceived service value.

Automated summary

This study examines the trade-off retailers face in implementing lenient or strict return policies, and analyzes the cognitive process through which consumers perceive, evaluate, and respond to these policies. The findings show that different dimensions of leniency have varying effects on consumers' purchase intentions.