4.6 Article

Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Density Functional Investigation of the Structural Evolution, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of CrSin- (n=14-18) Clusters

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 126, 期 8, 页码 1329-1335

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c09557

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11774255]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2020YFC2004602]
  3. Key Project of National Science Foundation of Tianjin City [17JCZDJC30100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structures and properties of CrSin- (n = 14-18) cluster anions were studied using photoelectron spectroscopy and calculations. Smaller clusters preferred cage-like structures, while larger clusters adopted fullerene-type structures with additional atoms attached to the surface of the cage. The Cr atoms acted as electron donors in all clusters, increasing the electron count in the cage.
CrSin- (n = 14-18) cluster anions have been investigated by a combination of photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) and first-principles calculations. The lowest-lying structures of the clusters have been determined by a global minimum search based on the genetic algorithm, combined with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The simulated PES spectra of the lowest-energy isomers are in agreement with the experimental results, which gives strong evidence that the correct structures have been found. While sizes n = 14 and n = 15 prefer cage-like structures based on multi-center bonding within the cage, the larger sizes adopt structures based on fullerene-type cages around the Cr atom, with the additional atoms attached to the cage surface. A Hirshfeld analysis shows that the Cr atoms act as electron donors in all clusters, thus enhancing the electron count in the cage. It also reveals that the magnetic moment of 1 mu(B) shown by all dusters is mainly contributed by the Cr atom. One interesting exception is size 17, where the Cr atom contributes a small moment antiparallel to that of the silicon cage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据