4.7 Article

Lower Cambrian helcionelloid macromolluscs from South Australia

期刊

GONDWANA RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 333-358

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2015.06.012

关键词

Mollusca; Macroscopic; Ontogeny; Taphonomy; Distribution

资金

  1. Macquarie University Postgraduate Fund
  2. ARC discovery project [129104251]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early Cambrian univalve molluscs are predominantly represented by microscopic forms (body length of 1-3 mm), preserved mainly as phosphatised internal moulds with limited definable features. Macromolluscs (>= 5 mm) are generally rare, occur in low abundance and are poorly preserved, often lacking apical features and ornament which hinders taxonomic assessment. New and previously undescribed material from lower Cambrian Hawker Group carbonates of the Flinders Ranges in South Australia includes four new taxa, Minastirithella silivreni gen. et sp. nov., Galeacalvus coronarius gen. et sp. nov., Helcionella histosia sp. nov., and Ilsanella enallaxa sp. nov. Three-dimensional silicified shell material preserved with intact apices offers new insight into protoconch morphology, growth habit (isometric vs. allometric) and developmental mode. This material supports previous suggestions that some micromollusc taxa may in fact be early ontogenetic stages (juveniles) of larger macroscopic taxa; such that the millimetric size range of helcionelloids conforms to the dimensions of earliest apical portion in some macromolluscs documented herein. However, taphonomic limitations associated with phosphatisation show that the morphology (especially height vs. width) of the apex can greatly influence the probability of steinkern formation and preservation potential for both micro-and macro scale helcionelloids. Artificial inflation in the appearance of millimetric helcionelloids with an optimal morphology for phosphatisation is thus directly linked to taphonomic biases in the fossil record. (C) 2015 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据