4.5 Article

The effects of nano-zinc oxide morphology on functional and antibacterial properties of tapioca starch bionanocomposite

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 4497-4508

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2426

关键词

antibacterial activity; morphology; nanotechnology; tapioca starch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the effect of nano-zinc oxide morphology on tapioca starch films, finding that ZnO-ns had the most significant impact on mechanical, physicochemical, and barrier properties. ZnO-ns also showed the highest tensile strength and Young's modulus, as well as the lowest elongation at break. ZnO-nr had the most significant impact on UV transmission.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-zinc oxide (ZnO-N) morphology on the functional and antimicrobial properties of tapioca starch films. For this reason, nanosphere (ZnO-ns), nanorod (ZnO-nr), and nanoparticle of ZnO (ZnO-np) at 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% were added to the starch film. Then, physicochemical, mechanical, and barrier properties were evaluated. Also, UV-visible and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra and antibacterial activity of prepared nanocomposite films against Escherichia coli were examined. The results revealed that the ZnO-ns had the most effects on mechanical, physicochemical, and barrier properties. The highest values of the tensile strength (14.15 MPa) and Young's modulus (32.74 MPa) and the lowest values of elongation at break (10.40%) were obtained in the films containing 2% of ZnO nanosphere. In terms of UV transmission, ZnO-nr showed the most significant impact morphology. FTIR spectra indicated that interactions for all morphologies were physical interaction, and there are no chemical reactions between starch structure and nanoparticles. The antibacterial effect of the ZnO-ns was higher than that of other morphologies. In summary, ZnO-ns was the best morphology for using ZnO-N in starch-based nanocomposite films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据