4.8 Article

Copper Promotes Tumorigenesis by Activating the PDK1-AKT Oncogenic Pathway in a Copper Transporter 1 Dependent Manner

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202004303

关键词

AKT; breast cancer; copper; CTR1; Nedd4l; PDK1

资金

  1. NIH [CA177910]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070767, 31871410, 81902487]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672954]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper activates the PI3K-AKT oncogenic signaling pathway to promote tumorigenesis, while CTR1 is abnormally elevated in breast cancer and regulated by Nedd4l-mediated ubiquitination. Targeting the CTR1-copper node may have therapeutic relevance for hyperactive AKT-driven cancers.
Copper plays pivotal roles in metabolic homoeostasis, but its potential role in human tumorigenesis is not well defined. Here, it is revealed that copper activates the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (PKB, also termed AKT) oncogenic signaling pathway to facilitate tumorigenesis. Mechanistically, copper binds 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1), in turn promotes PDK1 binding and subsequently activates its downstream substrate AKT to facilitate tumorigenesis. Blocking the copper transporter 1 (CTR1)-copper axis by either depleting CTR1 or through the use of copper chelators diminishes the AKT signaling and reduces tumorigenesis. In support of an oncogenic role for CTR1, the authors find that CTR1 is abnormally elevated in breast cancer, and is subjected by NEDD4 like E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (Nedd4l)-mediated negative regulation through ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. Accordingly, Nedd4l displays a tumor suppressive function by suppressing the CTR1-AKT signaling. Thus, the findings identify a novel regulatory crosstalk between the Nedd4l-CTR1-copper axis and the PDK1-AKT oncogenic signaling, and highlight the therapeutic relevance of targeting the CTR1-copper node for the treatment of hyperactive AKT-driven cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据