4.8 Article

Inhibitors of bacterial H2S biogenesis targeting antibiotic resistance and tolerance

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 372, 期 6547, 页码 1169-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abd8377

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gero LLC
  2. Russian Science Foundation [17-74-30030]
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2019-1660]
  4. NYU Therapeutic Alliances
  5. DoD [PR171734, PR171734P1]
  6. Blavatnik Family Foundation
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  8. Russian Science Foundation [21-74-25001] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of resistance to clinical antibiotics has prompted the development of a new antimicrobial strategy targeting the bacterial hydrogen sulfide (H2S) defense system. Inhibitors of the bacterial cystathionine g-lyase (CSE) have been found to enhance the effectiveness of bactericidal antibiotics against major human pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These inhibitors also disrupt bacterial tolerance, reduce biofilm formation, and decrease the number of persister bacteria surviving antibiotic treatment.
Emergent resistance to all clinical antibiotics calls for the next generation of therapeutics. Here we report an effective antimicrobial strategy targeting the bacterial hydrogen sulfide (H2S)-mediated defense system. We identified cystathionine g-lyase (CSE) as the primary generator of H2S in two major human pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and discovered small molecules that inhibit bacterial CSE. These inhibitors potentiate bactericidal antibiotics against both pathogens in vitro and in mouse models of infection. CSE inhibitors also suppress bacterial tolerance, disrupting biofilm formation and substantially reducing the number of persister bacteria that survive antibiotic treatment. Our results establish bacterial H2S as a multifunctional defense factor and CSE as a drug target for versatile antibiotic enhancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据