4.7 Article

Recovery of ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds and carotenoids from acerola by-products: An opportunity for their valorization

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111654

关键词

Gas-expanded liquids; Vitamin C; Antioxidant activity; Phytochemical profiling; Carotenoids

资金

  1. CAPES-PRINT (Brazil) [88887.310560/2018-00472]
  2. MINECO, Spain [AGL2017-89417-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, and carotenoids were successfully extracted from acerola by-products using gas-expanded liquids, containing a pool of bioactive compounds to meet the demand for natural nutraceuticals rich in vitamin C and polyphenols.
Ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds and carotenoids were extracted from acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC.) byproducts using gas-expanded liquids (GXLs) based on carbon dioxide expanded ethanol at 40 degrees C and 7 MPa. The by-products generated in the processing of acerola: bagasse (seed and peel) and non-pomace (from the juice clarification step), were studied separately. The overall extraction yields obtained were 3.8 and 12.9 g/100 g for bagasse and non-pomace, respectively. Ascorbic acid was not detected in the bagasse extract, while 158.2 mg/ gextract was found in non-pomace extract, and 193.7 mg/g was found in the acerola juice powder. The higher the concentration of ascorbic acid, the higher the antioxidant activity of the extracts. The phytochemical profile obtained by LC-Q-TOF-MS/MS showed a higher number of phenolic compounds (hydroxycinnamic acids and flavonoids) in the bagasse and non-pomace extracts when compared to acerola juice. In addition, GXL promoted the extraction of a pool of carotenoids (lutein and 13-carotene), pheophytin and chlorophyll derivatives detected by LC-APCI-MS/MS. The obtained extracts, rich in bioactive compounds, open an opportunity for the valorization of acerola by-products, meeting the current demand for natural nutraceuticals rich in vitamin C and polyphenols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据