4.5 Article

Expected glycemic impact and probiotic stimulating effects of whole grain flours of buckwheat, quinoa, amaranth and chia

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 1460-1467

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-021-05156-8

关键词

Pseudocereals; Glycemic index; Resistant starch; Probiotic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the four grains, amaranth had the lowest expected glycemic index, and chia flour promoted the growth of L. acidophilus but negatively affected B. bifidum. There was a significant relationship between resistant starch and the growth rate of probiotics.
Chia, amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat grains have been widely used in food formulations because of their high and balanced nutritional properties. Since all grains are not equally nutritious, there is a requirement for comparing the health-related effects and processing performance of a variety of whole grains. The expected glycemic index (eGI) flours of chia was determined to be quite low, and flours except quinoa can be classified as low GI foods. The highest resistant starch (RS) content (4.76 g/100 g) was found in amaranth flour, and it was followed by buckwheat (1.27 g/100 g). The amaranth had the highest stimulation effect on the growth of probiotics and increased the count of L. acidophilus and B. bifidum as 4.57 and 2.26 log CFU/ml, respectively. Moreover, chia flour showed a positive effect on the growth of L. acidophilus whereas it negatively affected B. bifidum compared to the control. A significant correlation was detected between rapidly available glucose content and eGI. On the other hand, a significant relationship between RS and the growth rate of probiotics was reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据