4.7 Article

Noncovalent interactions of bovine α-lactalbumin with green tea polyphenol, epigalocatechin-3-gallate

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 241-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.05.012

关键词

alpha-Lactalbumin; Epigallocatechin-3-gallate; Noncovalent interactions; Fluorescence quenching; Molecular docking; Monocyte uptake

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [172024]
  2. FP7 RegPot project FCUB ERA GA [256716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bovine alpha-lactalbumin (ALA) is an important Ca-binding protein of milk. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) is the major and the most biologically active catechin of green tea, which has the highest binding affinity to whey proteins due to galloyl functional group. In this study experimental and computational methods were used to investigate noncovalent interactions of EGCG and ALA. Binding affinity of EGCG for ALA, determined by fluorescence quenching analysis, was in the range described for complexes of EGCG and other dietary proteins, and lower than affinity of some phenolic compounds to ALA. Based on circular dichroism and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra, binding of EGCG change ALA conformation inducing alpha-helix to beta-structures transition. The isothermal titration calorimetry results suggest that the binding of EGCG to ALA is enthalpically favorable. The docking analysis shows that EGCG binds in the hydrophobic pocket at the entrance of cleft between alpha-helical and beta-sheetrich domains and includes residues of aromatic cluster II. Uptake of ALA by monocytes proceeds at a slower rate in the presence of EGCG suggesting that EGCG binding may impair uptake of ALA by antigen-presenting cells. ALA, being of low cost and widely available protein, can serve as suitable delivery system for EGCG, as well as for food fortification with this bioactive catechin. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据