4.7 Article

Structural characterization of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of the phenolic-rich fraction from defatted adlay (Coix lachryma-jobi L. var. ma-yuen Stapf) seed meal

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 509-517

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.083

关键词

Defatted adlay seed meal; Fractionation; Phenolic compounds; Antioxidant activity; Ferulic acid; Rutin; Quercetin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China - China [31571766]
  2. Major Program of Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province - China [15KJA550002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province - China [BK20141485]
  4. National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period - China [2012BAD33B04, 2014BAD04B03]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions - China (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study aims to investigate the antioxidant activities of various extracts from defatted adlay seed meal (DASM) based on the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay, peroxyl radical scavenging capacity (PSC) assay and cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) assay. Of all the fractions, the n-butanol fraction exhibited the highest antioxidant activity, followed by crude acetone extract and aqueous fractions. Of the three sub-fractions obtained by Sephadex LH-20 chromatography, subfraction 3 possessed the highest antioxidant activity and total phenolic content. There was a strong positive correlation between the total phenolic content and the antioxidant activity. Based on HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS analysis, the most abundant phenolic acid in sub-fraction 3 of DASM was ferulic acid at 67.28 mg/g, whereas the predominant flavonoid was rutin at 41.11 mg/g. Of the major individual compounds in sub-fraction 3, p-coumaric acid exhibited the highest ORAC values, and quercetin exhibited the highest PSC values and CAA values. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据