4.7 Article

Encapsulation of Lactobacillus in Low-Methoxyl Pectin-Based Microcapsules Stimulates Biofilm Formation: Enhanced Resistances to Heat Shock and Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 22, 页码 6281-6290

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00719

关键词

low-methoxyl pectin; encapsulation; biofilm; Lactobacillus; heat shock

资金

  1. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Hercules foundation [AUGE-09-029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized new low-methoxyl pectins as coating materials to encapsulate probiotics, demonstrating enhanced protection against heat shock, freeze-drying, and gastrointestinal digestion. Biofilm-forming microcapsules showed superior bacterial resistance compared to planktonic lactobacilli, highlighting their potential for improving probiotic survival.
Encapsulation is a common approach to improve the bacterial survival of probiotics. In this study, two new low-methoxyl pectins (CMP-6 and CMP-8) were used as coating materials to produce microcapsules (MCs) for the encapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LMG9433(T), Lactobacillus casei LMG6904(T), and Lactobacillus rhamnosus LMG25859. A fermentation test showed that encapsulation did not influence the fermentation ability of lactobacilli. The biofilm formation of encapsulated lactobacilli was stimulated when an in situ cultivation was conducted on MCs, which was verified by cryo-SEM observation. The resultant biofilm-forming MCs (BMCs) contained high-density bacterial cells (similar to 10(10) CFU/mL). Compared to planktonic lactobacilli, pectin-based MCs showed significant protection for encapsulated lactobacilli from heat shock and simulated gastric digestion. Especially, benefiting from the biofilm formation, BMCs provided higher protection with enhanced resistance to heat shock, freeze-drying, and gastrointestinal digestion than MCs. Our result highlighted the superior bacterial resistances of biofilmforming probiotics encapsulated in pectinate microcapsules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据