4.6 Article

Preparation, characterization and the supercapacitive behaviors of electrochemically re duce d graphene quantum dots/polypyrrole hybrids

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 385, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138435

关键词

Electrochemical reduction; Graphene quantum dots; Polypyrrole; Hybrids; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY18B0500 05]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province [20KJA150005]
  3. Shandong Key Laboratory of Biochemical Analysis [SKLBA2108]
  4. Future Research Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2017088]
  5. Advanced Catalysis and Green Manufacturing Collaborative Innovation Center [ACGM2016-06-27]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By electrostatic self-assembly and electrochemical reduction, ERGQDs/PPy hybrids were obtained with high specific capacitance, good rate capability, and high cyclic stability, showing potential as electrode materials for supercapacitors.
Developing advanced materials for energy conversion and storage devices is of significant importance for modern society. In this work, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) were electrostatically self-assembled with polypyrrole (PPy), and then electrochemically reduced GQDs (ERGQDs)/PPy hybrids were obtained via direct electrochemical reduction of the GQDs. The size and distribution of the PPy particles are closely correlated with the concentration of the pyrrole (Py) monomer. The obtained ERGQDs/PPy hybrids combine the advantages of electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLC) from ERGQDs and pseudo-capacitors from PPy, exhibiting high specific capacitance (418 F g -1 at 1 A g -1 ), good rate capability (75.8% capacitance retention at 10 A g -1 ) and high cyclic stability (86.0% capacitance retention after 10 0 0 cycles at 10 A g -1 ). These results indicate that the as-prepared ERGQDs/PPy hybrids might be a promising electrode material for supercapacitors. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据