4.5 Article

Analyses of viral genomes for G-quadruplex forming sequences reveal their correlation with the type of infection

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 13-27

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2021.03.017

关键词

G-quadruplex; Viral genome; Bioinformatics; Persistent infection; Acute infection; G4Hunter

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [1815548S]
  2. ANR FlashCovid 2021 call
  3. SYMBIT project from the ERDF [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000477]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G-quadruplexes play a role in regulating key molecular processes and are being explored for antiviral therapy. Analysis of putative G-quadruplex forming sequences (PQS) in viral genomes reveals their connection to viral lifecycle and infection type, with enrichment in viruses causing persistent infections.
G-quadruplexes contribute to the regulation of key molecular processes. Their utilization for antiviral therapy is an emerging field of contemporary research. Here we present comprehensive analyses of the presence and localization of putative G-quadruplex forming sequences (PQS) in all viral genomes currently available in the NCBI database (including subviral agents). The G4Hunter algorithm was applied to a pool of 11,000 accessible viral genomes representing 350 Mbp in total. PQS frequencies differ across evolutionary groups of viruses, and are enriched in repeats, replication origins, 50UTRs and 30UTRs. Importantly, PQS presence and localization is connected to viral lifecycles and corresponds to the type of viral infection rather than to nucleic acid type; while viruses routinely causing persistent infections in Metazoa hosts are enriched for PQS, viruses causing acute infections are significantly depleted for PQS. The unique localization of PQS identifies the importance of G-quadruplex-based regulation of viral replication and life cycle, providing a tool for potential therapeutic targeting. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据