4.5 Review

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal-assisted phytoremediation of soil contaminated with persistent organic pollutants: a review

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
卷 67, 期 5, 页码 624-640

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12375

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pole Mixte de la Cote d'Opale (PMCO)
  2. Region Nord-Pas de Calais
  3. Communaute Urbaine de Dunkerque
  4. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  5. CNRS
  6. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concern about soil contamination by persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that originate from intensive anthropogenic activities has now become a priority in industrialized countries. Some of these compounds can accumulate in the environment and threaten the development of living organisms because of their acute toxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogeneity. Among remediation methods for polluted soil, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)-assisted phytoremediation is an attractive approach to plant-based environmental remediation. Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations are important in the restoration of degraded ecosystems because of the benefits to their symbiotic partners. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are not only able to facilitate plant establishment and survival in POP-contaminated soil by protecting plants against the phytotoxicity of POPs, but also enhance soil bioremediation by stimulating telluric microbial activity and by improving soil structure. This phytotechnology, however, is still in its infancy and there has been little research on aged-contaminated soils. Its in situ effectiveness remains to be proved. This review summarizes current knowledge about the effect of POPs on the establishment and functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and its contribution to the phytoremediation of POP-polluted soil. It focuses on recent developments that aim to improve the efficiency of AMF-assisted phytoremediation in the dissipation of POPs and future directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据