4.7 Article

eDNA metabarcoding of small plankton samples to detect fish larvae and their preys from Atlantic and Pacific waters

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86731-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Government of the Principality of Asturias [IDI-2018-000201]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [GLOBALHAKE PID2019-108347RB-I00]
  3. Alfred Wegener Institute [AWI_PS116_00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized eDNA metabarcoding to detect zooplankton species in open and coastal waters, finding a lower taxonomic depth in tropical waters, suggesting a need for increased zooplankton barcoding efforts in these areas; these methods could be applied for early detection of important species in fisheries.
Zooplankton community inventories are the basis of fisheries management for containing fish larvae and their preys; however, the visual identification of early-stage larvae (the missing biomass) is difficult and laborious. Here, eDNA metabarcoding was employed to detect zooplankton species of interest for fisheries from open and coastal waters. High-Throughput sequencing (HTS) from environmental samples using small water volumes has been proposed to detect species of interest whose DNA is the most abundant. We analyzed 6-L water samples taken from subtropical and tropical waters using Cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene as metabarcode. In the open ocean, several commercial fish larvae and invertebrate species important in fish diet were found from metabarcodes and confirmed from individual barcoding. Comparing Atlantic, Mediterranean, Red Sea, and Pacific samples we found a lower taxonomic depth of OTU assignments in samples from tropical waters than in those from temperate ones, suggesting large gaps in reference databases for those areas; thus a higher effort of zooplankton barcoding in tropical oceans is highly recommended. This and similar simplified sampling protocols could be applied in early detection of species important for fisheries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据