4.6 Article

Breaking the von Neumann bottleneck: architecture-level processing-in-memory technology

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-020-3227-1

关键词

processing-in-memory (PIM); von Neumann bottleneck; memory wall; PIM simulator; architecture-level PIM

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0701500]
  2. Zhejiang Lab [2019KC0AB010]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [ZDBS-LY-JSC012]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS [XDB44000000]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS
  6. Anhui Natural Science Foundation [2008085QF330]
  7. Research Program of Anhui Normal University [751968]
  8. Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (BAAI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Processing-in-memory (PIM) is proposed as a promising solution to break the von Neumann bottleneck by minimizing data movement between memory hierarchies. This study focuses on prior art of architecture level DRAM PIM technologies and their implementation, discussing the key challenges, mainstream solutions, relative limitations of PIM simulation, and conventional PIM simulators. Research directions and perspectives are proposed for future development in PIM.
The memory wall problem or so-called von Neumann bottleneck limits the efficiency of conventional computer architectures, which move data from memory to CPU for computation; these architectures cannot meet the demands of the emerging memory-intensive applications. Processing-in-memory (PIM) has been proposed as a promising solution to break the von Neumann bottleneck by minimizing data movement between memory hierarchies. This study focuses on prior art of architecture level DRAM PIM technologies and their implementation. The key challenges and mainstream solutions of PIM are summarized and introduced. The relative limitations of PIM simulation are discussed, as well as four conventional PIM simulators. Finally, research directions and perspectives are proposed for future development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据