4.5 Article

Loss of IL-22 inhibits autoantibody formation in collagen-induced arthritis in mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 1404-1414

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201546241

关键词

Autoantibody formation; B cell; Germinal center; Interleukin 22 (IL-22); Rheumatoid arthritis

资金

  1. Dutch Arthritis Foundation (Reumafonds) [DAA 0801043]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Zon-MW Vidi grant) [917.10.377]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Zon-MW Veni grant) [916.13.011]
  4. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0006/2009]
  5. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interleukin 22 (IL-22) expression is associated with increased joint destruction and disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although IL-22 is considered a proinflammatory cytokine, its mechanism of action in RA remains incompletely understood. Here, we used the collagen-induced arthritis model in IL-22 deficient (IL-22(-/-)) mice to study the role of IL-22 in RA. In spite of normal disease incidence, disease severity is significantly diminished in IL-22(-/-) mice. Moreover, pathogenicity of Th17 cells and development and function of B cells are unaffected. In contrast, splenic plasma cells, as well as serum autoantibody titers, are reduced in the absence of IL-22. At the peak of disease, germinal centers (GCs) are severely reduced in the spleens of IL-22(-/-) mice, correlating with a decline in GC B-cell numbers. Within the GC, we identified IL-22R1 expressing follicular dendritic cell-like stromal cells. Human lymphoid stromal cells respond to IL-22 ex vivo by inducing transcription of CXCL12 and CXCL13. We therefore postulate IL-22 as an important enhancer of the GC reaction, maintaining chemokine levels for the persistence of GC reactions, essential for the production of autoantibody-secreting plasma cells. Blocking IL-22 might therefore prevent immune-complex deposition and destruction of joints in RA patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据