4.6 Article

Exploration of the Effect of Oxygen on Superconductivity in MgB2 Bulk by Using Boron Powder with Different Particle and Purification

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst11030278

关键词

boron powder; purification; particle size; MgB2; superconducting connectivity

资金

  1. Magnetic Resonance Union of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2020GZL001]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2212025]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51807191, 51777205]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation [12042506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical and heat treatment methods were used to purify boron powder with different particle sizes in this study. The reduction in particle size can enhance the chemical purification, while a decrease in oxygen content can lead to improvements in superconducting properties but also changes in Jc and pinning mechanisms in high magnetic fields. This work suggests that oxygen might act as both a pinning center and an obstacle for supercurrent in MgB2.
In this study, boron powder with different particle sizes was purified by both chemical and heat treatment methods. The reduction in the particle size can improve the chemical purification with no effort on the heat treatment. The superconducting properties of the powder drastically changed even with only a partial elimination of oxygen. On the one hand, less oxygen content resulted in high T-c and J(c) values under the low magnetic field, and most importantly, a significant improvement in the superconducting connectivity (A(f) value). On the other hand, the degradation of J(c) under a high field and a change in the pinning mechanism were also found, along with decreasing oxygen. This result indicated that oxygen, probably MgO, might act as the pinning center and as an obstacle for the supercurrent in MgB2 at the same time. This work paves the way for obtaining pure oxygen-free MgB2 and understanding the real effect of oxygen in MgB2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据