4.7 Article

Polyphenol content in apricot fruits

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109828

关键词

Fruit quality; Antioxidants; Neochlorogenic; Chlorogenic; Rutin; Quercetin-3-glucuronide

资金

  1. INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agraria) [2017-CO3-00011]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [GV/2016/189]
  3. INIA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apricot is a key fruit in the Mediterranean region, valued in the diets of Asian and Mediterranean countries. Polyphenols, the most abundant antioxidants in apricots, play a crucial role in defining fruit quality. The study identified the PPV resistant cultivar 'Goldrich' as the best for increasing antioxidants in apricot varieties.
Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) species is one of the most important Mediterranean fruits. The fruits are important in the diet of Asian and Mediterranean countries in which the apricot is used as fresh and dried fruit, being an important source of nutrients. Despite of the amount of genetic resources and diversity studies available into the species, there are a few studies focused on fruit quality. Among the different compounds of fruit quality, polyphenols are classified as the most abundant antioxidants in nature, being important as a source of health benefits as well as a potential source of natural products for the food industry. The important role of polyphenols in human nutrition, outline these compounds as the most relevant for defining fruit quality. In this study, the polyphenol content on fruits from different apricot varieties included elite cultivars and hybrids from the IVIA breeding program have been compared for identifying the genotypes with relevant contribution to fruit quality. The most important compounds obtained in terms of quantity were: phenolic acids and flavonoids. Results identified the PPV resistant cultivar 'Goldrich' as the best cultivar for increasing the content of antioxidants in the varieties of the breeding program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据