4.7 Article

GC-MS based metabolomic approach to understand nutraceutical potential of Cannabis seeds from two different environments

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 339, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128076

关键词

Amino acids; Antioxidant properties; Cannabinoids; Cannabis sativa L.; Nutraceutical; Seed metabolome

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted an untargeted metabolomic study on cannabis seeds, finding that the Himalayan accession exhibited superior accumulation of nutrients and higher antioxidant and nutraceutical potential compared to the subtropical accession. The exclusive presence of linoleic acid and a-linolenic acid in the seed oil of the Himalayan accession was noted. The environmental impact on the antioxidant and nutraceutical value in seeds was also discussed.
Cannabis sativa L. is a valuable plant that has regained its importance for medicinal use. Gas chromatographymass spectrometry based untargeted metabolomic study was conducted in seeds of two accessions from different environments. A total of 236 metabolites were observed, and 43 metabolites were found differentially significant (p <= 0.05) in both the accessions. Based on the qualitative and quantitative accumulation of the nutraceutically important amino acids, cannabinoids, alkaloids, and fatty acids, the high altitude temperate Himalayan accession (CAN2) was found to have an advantage over the low altitude subtropical accession (CAN1). Seed oil from CAN2 showed the exclusive presence of linoleic acid and a- linolenic acid. The reducing power and DNA nicking assay on the methanolic extracts suggested higher antioxidant and nutraceutical potential in CAN2 and corroborated with the metabolic content of phenols and flavonoids. The environmental effect on the antioxidant and nutraceutical value in seeds is further discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据