4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Electrodeposited Co-Doped Fe3O4 Thin Films as Efficient Catalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 942-949

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.194

关键词

electrodeposition; CoxFe3-xO4; catalytic activity; oxygen evolution reaction; thin film

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of highly active electrocatalysts at a low cost is essential to the process of generating hydrogen fuel through electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Here, we report a comprehensive investigation of the one-step electrodeposited cobalt-doped magnetite (CoxFe3-xO4, 0 < x < 1) thin films as active and stable OER catalysts in alkaline solutions. The CoxFe3-xO4 thin film electrode can be fabricated in minutes or even tens of seconds. The Co-doping concentration, thickness, and orientation of the CoxFe3-xO4 films can be simply controlled by varying the deposition potential, deposition time, and the substrate, respectively. The dependences of the catalytic activity of the CoxFe3-xO4 films on the composition, thickness, and orientation of growth are explored. The CoxFe3-xO4 films exhibit greatly enhanced catalytic activities toward the OER compared to the Fe3O4 thin film. The polycrystalline CoxFe3-xO4 film deposited at 0.88 V-Ag/AgCl for 150 seconds exhibits the highest catalytic activity with an overpotential of 0.42 Vat a current density of 10 mA cm (2), a Tafel slope of 53 mV dec (1), and an exchange current density of about 2.39 x 10 (10) A cm (2), which are comparable to those of Co3O4. Besides, the CoxFe3-xO4 films possess good stability during the long-term electrolysis at a current density of 10 mA cm (2) in 1 M NaOH. The satisfactory catalytic activity and stability combined with the simplicity of fabrication make the electrodeposited CoxFe3-xO4 films economically and environmentally preferable compared to Co3O4 as catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据