4.6 Article

On the oxygen reduction reaction in phosphoric acid electrolyte: Evidence of significantly increased inhibition at steady state conditions

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 78-83

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.065

关键词

Anion Adsorption; Phosphoric acid electrolyte; HT-PEMFC; Oxygen reduction reaction; Pt; Viscoelectric Effect

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Danish Council for Strategic Research (4M Centre)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the presented work, we investigate the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in half-cell measurements employing different electrolytes. The aim is to compare the ORR inhibition due to anion adsorption at transient as well as steady state conditions. It is found that the ORR inhibition at the platinum - phosphoric acid electrolyte interface is a relative slow, time dependent process. The major inhibition is not observed in transient polarization curves but only under steady state conditions. This observation is in contrast to the typical ORR inhibition due to anion adsorption as observed for example in sulfuric acid electrolyte. In sulfuric acid the inhibition is fast and then stays more or less constant in time. As a consequence of our findings, common transient measurements of the ORR activity might not be sufficient to investigate suitable mitigation strategies for the ORR inhibition in phosphoric acid electrolyte. Such strategies need to take steady state conditions into account. In order to explain the slow ORR inhibition in phosphoric acid electrolyte, two possible explanations are discussed. Either the adsorption of phosphate is a slow, complex process, where a fast adsorption step is followed by a consecutive filling of the surface, or a mass transfer barrier develops at the polarized phosphoric acid-electrode interface. The latter might be the viscoelectric effect that is known from colloidal science. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据