标题
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Science Advances
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages eabd0299
出版商
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
发表日期
2021-01-07
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.abd0299
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Unlock ways to share data on peer review
- (2020) Flaminio Squazzoni et al. NATURE
- Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines
- (2020) Junming Huang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
- (2019) Giangiacomo Bravo et al. Nature Communications
- Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
- (2019) Charles W. Fox et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Speaking of gender bias
- (2019) May R. Berenbaum PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Correction: Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal
- (2019) Hannah A. Edwards et al. PLoS One
- The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?
- (2018) Luke Holman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals
- (2018) Giangiacomo Bravo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- R-squared for Bayesian regression models
- (2018) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan
- (2017) Paul-Christian Bürkner Journal of Statistical Software
- Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data
- (2017) Flaminio Squazzoni et al. NATURE
- Journals invite too few women to referee
- (2017) Jory Lerback et al. NATURE
- Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
- (2017) Andrew Tomkins et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Gender bias in scholarly peer review
- (2017) Markus Helmer et al. eLife
- Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact
- (2017) Peter van den Besselaar et al. PLoS One
- Solving the Productivity and Impact Puzzle: Do Men Outperform Women, or are Metrics Biased?
- (2016) Elissa Z. Cameron et al. BIOSCIENCE
- Journals and funders confront implicit bias in peer review
- (2016) G. Pinholster SCIENCE
- Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
- (2015) Charles W. Fox et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines
- (2015) S.-J. Leslie et al. SCIENCE
- Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks
- (2015) Jinseok Kim et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science
- (2013) Vincent Larivière et al. NATURE
- The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship
- (2013) Jevin D. West et al. PLoS One
- Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science
- (2013) Lesley G. Campbell et al. PLoS One
- Bias in peer review
- (2012) Carole J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?
- (2012) Pleun van Arensbergen et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science
- (2011) S. J. Ceci et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review
- (2009) Robyn M. Borsuk et al. BIOSCIENCE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation