4.8 Article

Differential contribution of transcriptomic regulatory layers in the definition of neuronal identity

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20483-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  2. CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship
  3. C.H. Best Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  5. Medicine by Design Canada First Research Excellence Fund
  6. Marie Curie IOF Fellowship
  7. Scrimshaw Family fellowship
  8. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the differential contributions of transcriptomic regulatory layers to neuronal subtype specification, revealing that profiles of alternative splicing and polyadenylation were more effective in discriminating neuronal subtypes than gene expression patterns.
Previous transcriptomic profiling studies have typically focused on separately analyzing mRNA expression, alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation differences between cell and tissue types. However, the relative contribution of these three transcriptomic regulatory layers to cell type specification is poorly understood. This question is particularly relevant to neurons, given their extensive heterogeneity associated with brain location, morphology and function. In the present study, we generated profiles for the three regulatory layers from developmentally and regionally distinct subpopulations of neurons from the mouse hippocampus and broader nervous system. Multi-omics factor analyses revealed differing contributions of each transcriptomic layer in the discrimination of neurons based on their stage of development, region, and function. Importantly, profiles of differential alternative splicing and polyadenylation better discriminated specific neuronal subtype populations than gene expression patterns. These results provide evidence for differential relative contributions of coordinated gene regulatory layers in the specification of neuronal subtypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据