4.7 Article

Nonlinear vibration analysis of fiber reinforced composite cylindrical shells with partial constrained layer damping treatment

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107000

关键词

Fiber-reinforced composite shell; Constrained layer damping; Nonlinear material modeling; Strain dependence; Nonlinear vibration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51505070, 11972204]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [N180302004, N180703018, N180312012, N180313006]
  3. Science Foundation of the National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments [6142905192512]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes a novel analytical model capable of accurately predicting the strain-dependent characteristics of fiber reinforced composite shells (FRCSs) with partial constrained layer damping (CLD) treatment by considering the nonlinearities of fiber reinforced composite and viscoelastic materials simultaneously. The nonlinear material properties are represented based on Jones-Nelson nonlinear theory, energy-based strain energy method, and complex modulus method. Then, the governing equations of motion for FRCSs are developed via Ritz method, and the identification procedure of nonlinear fitting parameters is also presented. By taking a T300 carbon fiber/epoxy resin cylindrical shell with partial CLD patches as an example, a series of experiments are carried out to validate the proposed modeling approach. Finally, the effects of material properties on nonlinear vibration behaviors of FRCSs covered with partial CLD patches are evaluated. Comparisons show that the proposed nonlinear model is more accuracy than that without considering strain dependence, where the maximum errors between the proposed model and measured data for natural frequencies, damping ratios and resonant response are 6.9%, 11.3%, and 11.2%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据