4.6 Article

CSCF: a chaotic sine cosine firefly algorithm for practical application problems

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 7011-7030

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05474-6

关键词

CSCF; Engineering design problems; Variants; Chaotic maps; Optimization function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a novel chaotic sine-cosine firefly (CSCF) algorithm and its variants to solve optimization problems. By integrating the chaotic form of the sine-cosine algorithm and firefly algorithm, the algorithm aims to improve convergence speed and efficiency while minimizing complexity issues. The performance of the CSCF algorithm is verified using various chaotic benchmark functions.
Recently, numerous meta-heuristic-based approaches are deliberated to reduce the computational complexities of several existing approaches that include tricky derivations, very large memory space requirement, initial value sensitivity, etc. However, several optimization algorithms namely firefly algorithm, sine-cosine algorithm, and particle swarm optimization algorithm have few drawbacks such as computational complexity and convergence speed. So to overcome such shortcomings, this paper aims in developing a novel chaotic sine-cosine firefly (CSCF) algorithm with numerous variants to solve optimization problems. Here, the chaotic form of two algorithms namely the sine-cosine algorithm and the firefly algorithms is integrated to improve the convergence speed and efficiency thus minimizing several complexity issues. Moreover, the proposed CSCF approach is operated under various chaotic phases and the optimal chaotic variants containing the best chaotic mapping are selected. Then numerous chaotic benchmark functions are utilized to examine the system performance of the CSCF algorithm. Finally, the simulation results for the problems based on engineering design are demonstrated to prove the efficiency, robustness and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据