4.6 Article

NiSe2/Ti3C2 as a promising cathode material for rechargeable dual Mg/Li-ion battery

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128721

关键词

NiSe2; Ti3C2; Mg/Li hybrid ion battery; Composite materials; Nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51801100, 51771092, 21975125]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [18KJB430014]
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX18_0341]
  4. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [XNY-020]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The NiSe2/Ti3C2 hybrid prepared by a one-step hydrothermal method is utilized as a cathode material for the first time in Mg/Li hybrid ion battery (MLIB). It exhibits superior electrochemical performance, with a reversible capacity three times higher than pure NiSe2, attributed to improved conductivity and reduced charge-transfer resistance introduced by Ti3C2. This work offers a novel method to design cathode materials with high rate performance by combining MXenes with metal selenides.
NiSe2/Ti3C2 hybrid prepared by the one-step hydrothermal method is used as a cathode material for Mg/Li hybrid ion battery (MLIB) for the first time. The NiSe2/Ti3C2 hybrid shows exciting electrochemical performance, with a reversible capacity of 150 mA h g(-1) at a very high current density of 5 A g(-1). In contrast, pure NiSe2 only has a capacity of 50 mA h g(-1) at 5 A g(-1). The sharp improvement can be ascribed to the enhanced conductivity and the lowered charge-transfer resistance (R-ct) when Ti3C2 is introduced. Moreover, the working mechanism of NiSe2/Ti3C2 in MLIB is investigated. This work provides a novel method to design cathode materials with high rate performance by combining MXenes with metal selenides. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据