4.6 Article

Development of a novel nanoflow liquid chromatography-parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based method for quantification of angiotensin peptides in HUVEC cultures

期刊

PEERJ
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9941

关键词

Angiotensin; High-resolution mass spectrometry; Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; Parallel reaction monitoring; Renin-angiotensin system

资金

  1. science and technology plan of Guangdong provincial science and technology department [2017ZC0204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. This study aimed to develop an analytical method using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the determination of angiotensin (Ang) I, Ang (1-9), Ang II, Ang (1-7), Ang (1-5), Ang III, Ang IV in human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) culture supernatant. Methods. HUVEC culture supernatant was added with gradient concentrations (0.05-1,000 ng/ml) of standard solutions of the Ang peptides. These samples underwent C18 solid-phase extraction and separation using a preconcentration nano-liquid chromatography mass spectrometry system. The target peptides were detected by a Q Exactive quadrupole orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometer in the parallel reaction monitoring mode. Ang converting enzyme (ACE) in HUVECs was silenced to examine Ang I metabolism. Results. The limit of detection was 0.1 pg for Ang II and Ang III, and 0.5 pg for Ang (19), Ang (1-7), and Ang (1-5). The linear detection range was 0.1-2,000 pg (0.05-1,000 ng/ml) for Ang II and Ang III, and 0.5-2,000 pg (0.25-1,000 ng/ml) for Ang (1-9) and Ang (1-5). Intra-day and inter-day precisions (relative standard deviation) were <10%. Ang II, Ang III, Ang IV, and Ang (1-5) were positively correlated with ACE expression by HUVECs, while Ang I, Ang (1-7), and Ang (1-9) were negatively correlated. Conclusion. The nanoflow liquid chromatography-parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based methodology established in this study can evaluate the Ang peptides simultaneously in HUVEC culture supernatant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据