标题
Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability
作者
关键词
-
出版物
eLife
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
发表日期
2020-09-15
DOI
10.7554/elife.58237
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
- (2020) Stephan Lewandowsky et al. Nature Communications
- The quest for an optimal alpha
- (2019) Jeff Miller et al. PLoS One
- The preregistration revolution
- (2018) Brian A. Nosek et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
- (2018) T. D. Stanley et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Scientific Misconduct
- (2016) Charles Gross Annual Review of Psychology
- On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science
- (2016) Valen E. Johnson et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
- (2016) Silas Boye Nissen et al. eLife
- A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology
- (2016) Alexander Etz et al. PLoS One
- Statistics: P values are just the tip of the iceberg
- (2015) Jeffrey T. Leek et al. NATURE
- Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
- (2015) Anna Dreber et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
- (2014) R. Chris Fraley et al. PLoS One
- Excess Success for Psychology Articles in the Journal Science
- (2014) Gregory Francis et al. PLoS One
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
- (2014) Timothy M Errington et al. eLife
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
- (2011) Florian Prinz et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search