4.6 Article

Identifying crop water stress using deep learning models

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 5353-5367

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05325-4

关键词

Crop phenotyping; Confusion matrix; DCNN; Digital agriculture; Machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying water stress in crops is crucial for global food security and sustainable agriculture. Image processing combined with machine learning, particularly deep learning techniques like GoogLeNet, show promising results in accurately identifying water stress in maize, okra, and soybean crops. The GoogLeNet model displayed superior performance with high accuracy and low error rates.
The identification of water stress is a major challenge for timely and effective irrigation to ensure global food security and sustainable agriculture. Several direct and indirect methods exist for identification of crop water stress, but they are time consuming, tedious and require highly sophisticated sensors or equipment. Image processing is one of the techniques which can help in the assessment of water stress directly. Machine learning techniques combined with image processing can aid in identifying water stress beyond the limitations of traditional image processing. Deep learning (DL) techniques have gained momentum recently for image classification and the convolutional neural network based on DL is being applied widely. In present study, comparative assessment of three DL models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet and Inception V3 are applied for identification of water stress in maize (Zea mays), okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and soybean (Glycine max) crops. A total of 1200 digital images were acquired for each crop to form the input dataset for the deep learning models. Among the three models, performance of GoogLeNet was found to be superior with an accuracy of 98.3, 97.5 and 94.1% for maize, okra and soybean, respectively. The onset of convergence in GoogLeNet models commenced after 8 epochs with 22 (maize), 31 (okra) and 15 (soybean) iterations per epoch with error rate of less than 7.5%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据