4.7 Article

Temperature Variation Enables the Design of Biobased Block Copolymers via One-Step Anionic Copolymerization

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/marc.202000513

关键词

anionic polymerization; biopolymers; morphology; myrcene; self-assembly

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GA2169/7-1, DFG-PAK 962/1]
  2. Rhine-Main Universities Mainz-Darmstadt
  3. DFG [INST 163/445-1 FUGG]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The one-pot anionic block copolymerization approach controlled by temperature is applicable to other terpene-diene monomers. Temperature control enables the formation of polymyrcene blocks, with transmission electron microscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering measurements confirming the presence of clearly microphase-separated, long range-ordered domains in the block copolymers.
A one-pot approach for the preparation of diblock copolymers consisting of polystyrene and polymyrcene blocks is described via a temperature-induced block copolymer (BCP) formation strategy. A monomer mixture of styrene and myrcene is employed. The unreactive nature of myrcene in a polar solvent (tetrahydrofuran) at -78 degrees C enables the sole formation of active polystyrene macroinitiators, while an increase of the temperature (-38 degrees C to room temperature) leads to poly(styrene-block-myrcene) formation due to polymerization of myrcene. Well-defined BCPs featuring molar masses in the range of 44-117.2 kg mol(-1)with dispersities,(sic), of 1.09-1.21, and polymyrcene volume fractions of 30-64% are accessible. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry measurements reveal the temperature-controlled polymyrcene block formation, while both transmission electron microscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering measurements prove the presence of clearly microphase-separated, long range-ordered domains in the block copolymers. The temperature-controlled one-pot anionic block copolymerization approach may be general for other terpene-diene monomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据