4.7 Article

Cuisinomics: MS-based untargeted approach reveals chemical modulation by a recipe during home cooking

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109787

关键词

Phytoprostanes; Hydroxycinnamic acid derivates; Home-cooking; Extra virgin olive oil; Tomato sofrito sauce; Onion; 3,4 dihydroxyphenylglycone; Phenolics

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2019/11324-8, 2013/07914-8]
  2. Miniserio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  3. CYCIT [AGL2013-49083-C3-3-R, AGL2016-75329-R]
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (AEI/FEDER, UE)
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya (GC) [2017SGR 196]
  6. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, ISCIII (CIBEROBN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of daily eaten food are cooked, which helps in absorbing nutrients and phytochemicals, but at the same time it can decrease its content. Currently, the impact of cooking has been studied that could influence food health related compounds, but they have a limited view of compounds by not consider molecular structural modifications and new compounds formation. An untargeted approach using LC-ESI-LQT-Orbitrap-MS/MS and univariate/multivariate statistical analysis was applied to understand how the preparation of a recipe, varying its ingredients (olive oil, 5-10%; onion, 20-40%; and garlic, 2-4%) and cooking time, could modulate the chemical profile of a tomato sofrito sauce. The presence of unexplored compounds that may have a beneficial effect on health, such as phytoprostanes, hydroxycinnamic acid amides and compounds such as 3,4 dihydroxyphenylglycone was revealed. Moreover, cooking was able to modulate the content of compounds like amino acids, thiosulfates or phenolics and could be used as a tool to increase these molecules. The untargeted approach on cooking allows to use a recipe as a tool to improve a chemical profile of a dish, which opens the view for new dietary recommendations by cuisine to improve our diet, habits and health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据