4.4 Article

Authentication of Leaves and Petioles ofPiper betleL. Varieties via Elemental Composition and Multivariate Chemometric Analysis

期刊

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 1794-1808

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2020.1825465

关键词

Authentication; Betel leaves and petioles; inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (ICP-MS); inductively coupled plasma - optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); principal component analysis (PCA)

资金

  1. Bangabandhu Science and Technology Fellowship Trust, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the authentication of various Piper betle L. varieties through chemical analysis, revealing that concentrations of macro elements are largely type-dependent while trace elements are within safe limits. The study also showed that chemometrics is a promising approach for variety authentication.
Piper betleL. (betel) is largely consumed for mastication, mouth freshening, and medicinal purposes throughout the world. This study reports the authentication ofPiper betleL. var.; Bangla, Sanchi, Misti, Khasia, and BARI Paan 3. The samples were analyzed for Ca, P, K, Mg, Na, Zn, Fe, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Sr, Ba, Li, Be, V, Co, Ga, Se, U, Cs, As, Cd, Tl, and Pb by inductively coupled plasma - optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and ICP - mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Among the macro elements, the concentrations (0.12-8.37 g/kg) are largely type dependent and statistically different, except for Na (0.12-0.34 g/kg). Furthermore, the analyzed samples may be good sources of K (3.99-8.37 g/kg), Ca (1.86-2.88 g/kg), and Mg (0.51-1.91 g/kg). The trace elements were in safe limits, except for Mn and Pb. Using multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analyses (LDA), the variability indices were 85.5% and 100%, respectively. Hence, chemometrics is a promising approach for the authentication of betel varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据