4.8 Article

p53 destabilizing protein skews asymmetric division and enhances NOTCH activation to direct self-renewal of TICs

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16616-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1R01AA018857-01, R01 AA025204-01A1, R21AA025470-01A1, 5P30DK048522-13, P50AA011999, P30CA014089, R24AA012885, NCRR S10RR019253, S10OD021785, S10RR027665]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-12-17701-MPC, IRG-58-007-48]
  3. NIH/NVRR S10

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs) are defective in maintaining asymmetric cell division and responsible for tumor recurrence. Cell-fate-determinant molecule NUMB-interacting protein (TBC1D15) is overexpressed and contributes to p53 degradation in TICs. Here we identify TBC1D15-mediated oncogenic mechanisms and tested the tumorigenic roles of TBC1D15 in vivo. We examined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in alcohol Western diet-fed hepatitis C virus NS5A Tg mice with hepatocyte-specific TBC1D15 deficiency or expression of non-phosphorylatable NUMB mutations. Liver-specific TBC1D15 deficiency or non-p-NUMB expression reduced TIC numbers and HCC development. TBC1D15-NuMA1 association impaired asymmetric division machinery by hijacking NuMA from LGN binding, thereby favoring TIC self-renewal. TBC1D15-NOTCH1 interaction activated and stabilized NOTCH1 which upregulated transcription of NANOG essential for TIC expansion. TBC1D15 activated three novel oncogenic pathways to promote self-renewal, p53 loss, and Nanog transcription in TICs. Thus, this central regulator could serve as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of HCC. Normal stem cells are maintained by asymmetric cell division, but this process is dysregulated in tumour initiating stem-like cells (TICs). Here, the authors show that TBC1D15 impairs the asymmetric division machinery and activates NOTCH pathway for TIC self-renewal and expansion to promote liver tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据