4.6 Article

When should the e-tailer offer complimentary return-freight insurance ?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107890

关键词

Product returns; Return-freight insurance; E-commerce; Game theory

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [71871049]
  2. 111 Project [B16009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumers have recently become very concerned about the role of return-freight insurance (RI) in the e-commerce platform, where it appears prior to making the online purchase decision. In an effort to encourage consumers to buy products, some e-tailers will offer complimentary return-freight insurance (CRI), and it has become an established and recognized practice. Some e-tailers have stopped offering this resource, however, and offer consumers the opportunity to purchase RI. To examine an e-tailer's RI strategy, we consider a market consisting of a manufacturer and an e-tailer. Three alternative scenarios are investigated: 1) Scenario N where there is no RI; 2) Scenario C where consumers may purchase RI; and 3) Scenario S where the e-tailer offers CRI. We find that the introduction of RI increases the price level, and it does not necessarily benefit the manufacturer and the e-tailer. The RI premium incurred by the e-tailer and the return-freight compensation play a critical role in selecting the RI strategy. When the former is low and the latter is high, the e-tailer is willing to offer CRI. Meanwhile, the manufacturer has the incentive to bear the RI premium for the e-tailer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据