4.7 Article

Chemometric-assisted construction of a biosensing device to measure chlorogenic acid content in brewed coffee beverages to discriminate quality

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 315, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126306

关键词

Statistical mixture design; Biosensor architecture; Bothyosphaeria rhodina MAMB-05; Platinum nanoparticles; Voltammetric fingerprint; Coffee beverages

资金

  1. Brazilian government funding agency CNPq [408591/2018-8]
  2. Brazilian government funding agency CAPES [001, 88882.448537/2019-01, 88882.448533/2019-01, 88882.448536/2019-01]
  3. Brazilian government funding agency Fundacao Araucaria do Parana [001/17-3765, 45763 - Conv. 296/2015]
  4. Brazilian government funding agency Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2015/11452-5]
  5. Brazilian government funding agency CAPES (PROAP 2018)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we propose the use of statistical mixture design in the construction of a biosensor device based on graphite oxide, platinum nanoparticles and biomaterials obtained from Botryosphaeria rhodina MAMB-05. The biosensor was characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Under optimized experimental parameters by factorial design, the biosensor was applied to the voltammetric determination of chlorogenic acid (CGA) measured as 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA). The biosensor response was linear (R-2 = 0.998) for 5-CQA in the concentration range 0.56-7.3 mu mol L-1, with limit of detection and quantification of 0.18 and 0.59 mu mol L-1, respectively. The new biosensing device was applied to quality control analysis based upon the determination of CGA content in specialty and traditional coffee beverages. The results indicated that specialty coffee had a significantly higher content of CGA. Principal component analysis of the voltammetric fingerprint of brewed coffees revealed that the laccase-based biosensor can be used for their discrimination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据