4.7 Article

Endoplasmic reticulum stress-dependent activation of iNOS/NO-NF-κB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome contributes to endothelial inflammation and apoptosis associated with microgravity

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 10835-10849

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.202000734R

关键词

apoptosis; endoplasmic reticulum stress; endothelial cells; inflammation; microgravity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871516, 81571841, 81571840, 81772013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to microgravity results in vascular remodeling and cardiovascular dysfunction. To elucidate the mechanism involved in this condition, we investigated whether endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress during simulated microgravity induced endothelial inflammation and apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Microgravity was simulated by clinorotation in the current study. We examined markers of ER stress, inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS)/NO content, proinflammatory cytokine production, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B)/I kappa B signaling, NLRP3 inflammasome, and detected apoptosis in HUVECs. We found that the levels of C/EBP homologous protein and glucose-regulated protein 78, pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-8, and IL-1 beta), and iNOS/NO content were upregulated by clinorotation. ER stress inhibition with tauroursodeoxycholic acid or 4-phenylbutyric acid and iNOS inhibition with 1400 W dramatically suppressed activation of the NF-kappa B/I kappa B pathway and the NLRP3 inflammasome, and decreased the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The increase of apoptosis in HUVECs during clinorotation was significantly suppressed by inhibiting ER stress, iNOS activity, NF-kappa B/I kappa B, and the NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway. Therefore, simulated microgravity causes ER stress in HUVECs, and subsequently activates iNOS/NO-NF-kappa B/I kappa B and the NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway, which have key roles in the induction of endothelial inflammation and apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据