4.8 Article

Paving the road toward the use of β-Fe2O3 in solar water splitting: Raman identification, phase transformation and strategies for phase stabilization

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1059-1067

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa039

关键词

solar energy conversion; metastable phase; phase transformation; iron oxide; photoelectrochemical water splitting

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0209303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1663228, 51902153, 51972165]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although beta-Fe2O3 has a high theoretical solar-to-hydrogen efficiency because of its narrow band gap, the study of beta-Fe2O3 photoanodes for water splitting is elusive as a result of their metastable nature. Raman identification of beta-Fe2O3 is theoretically and experimentally investigated in this study for the first time, thus clarifying the debate about its Raman spectrum in the literature. Phase transformation of beta-Fe2O3 to alpha-Fe2O3 was found to potentially take place under laser and electron irradiation as well as annealing. Herein, phase transformation of beta-Fe2O3 to alpha-Fe2O3 was inhibited by introduction of Zr doping, and beta-Fe2O3 was found to withstand a higher annealing temperature without any phase transformation. The solar water splitting photocurrent of the Zr-doped beta-Fe2O3 photoanode was increased by 500% compared to that of the pure beta-Fe2O3 photoanode. Additionally, Zr-doped beta-Fe2O3 exhibited very good stability during the process of solar water splitting. These results indicate that by improving its thermal stability, metastable beta-Fe2O3 film is a promising photoanode for solar water splitting. The use of element doping to prevent the phase transition of metastable semiconductors has been approved for the application of photoelectrochemcial hydrogen production via water splitting for the first time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据