4.1 Article

Optimization of Biosynthesis Conditions for the Production of Exopolysaccharides by Lactobacillus plantarum SP8 and the Exopolysaccharides Antioxidant Activity Test

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 334-345

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12088-020-00865-8

关键词

Lactobacillus plantarum; Exopolysaccharides (EPSs); Process optimization; Response surface methodology (RSM); Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31560447]
  2. Analysis and Testing Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology [2016T20110135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactobacillus plantarum SP8, isolated from traditional Chinese pickle juice, was utilized for the production of exopolysaccharides (EPSs), but the EPS yield was low under normal MRS medium. The single factor experiment and response surface methodology were used to optimize the medium components and culture conditions and the optimal conditions for EPS production were successfully obtained. Results showed that the optimum condition was glucose 22 g/L, yeast extract 30 g/L, fermentation temperature 35.6 degrees C, fermentation time 22 h and the theoretical EPS yield was 282.494 mg/L. The results were similar to the actual yield, 280.105 mg/L. By optimizing the culture conditions, the yield of L. plantarum SP8 EPS was improved by nearly 19 times. In the gas chromatography analysis, it was found that L. plantarum SP8 EPS consisted of d-rhamnose, arabinose, galactose, and d-acetylglucosamine, but glucose was not included, which was quite different from the reported heteropolysaccharide component of Lactobacillus. Furthermore, the antioxidant activity of L. plantarum SP8 EPS was evaluated with the in vitro scavenging abilities on DPPH center dot, O2- and center dot OH. The in vitro antioxidant activity study indicated that L. plantarum SP8 EPS possessed certain antioxidant activity. All results demonstrated the potential of L. plantarum SP8 in the food and dairy industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据