4.7 Article

Occurrence and Characterization of Fungi and Mycotoxins in Contaminated Medicinal Herbs

期刊

TOXINS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins12010030

关键词

mycoflora; medicinal herbs; mycotoxin; contamination; aflatoxins; citrinin; mycotoxigenic fungi; multiplex PCR; HPLC-MS; MS

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0400901]
  2. GDAS' Project of Science and Technology Development [2019GDASYL-0201001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional medicinal herbs are widely used and may be contaminated with mycotoxigenic fungi during cultivation, harvesting, and storage, causing spoilage and mycotoxin production. We evaluated the predominant mycoflora and extent of mycotoxin contaminations in 48 contaminated samples of 13 different medicinal herbs. In total, 70.8% of herbs were slightly contaminated with aflatoxins (<5 mu g kg(-1)). Codonopsis radix samples contained ochratoxin A (OTA) (360-515 mu g kg(-1)), and Scutellariae radix samples contained OTA (49-231 mu g kg(-1)) and citrinin (15-53 mu g kg(-1)). Forty samples (83.3%) contained fungal contamination. Sixty-nine strains were characterized via morphological and molecular identification. The predominant mycoflora comprised four genera, Aspergillus spp. (26.1%), Penicillium spp. (24.6%), Rhizopus spp. (14.5%), and Trichoderma spp. (11.6%). Aflatoxins, OTA, and citrinin were detected in 37 cultures by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Approximately 21.6% of Aspergillus and Penicillium isolates produced mycotoxins. One Penicillium polonicum strain isolated from Scutellariae radix synthesized citrinin. Multiplex PCR analysis showed that three Aspergillus flavus strains harbored aflatoxin biosynthesis genes. One Aspergillus flavus strain isolated from Amomi fructus produced AFB(1) and AFB(2). To the best of our knowledge, the citrinin production by Aspergillus chevalieri and Penicillium sacculum was first reported in this study, which poses a potential risk of mycotoxin contamination in medicinal herbs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据