4.7 Article

Chromosome constitution and nuclear DNA content of Phalaenopsis hybrids

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109089

关键词

Breeding; Chromosome; Genome size; Polyploidizetion; Karyotype

资金

  1. Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [NSC 102-2313-B-178-001-MY3]
  3. National Museum of Natural Science, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phalaenopsis is one of the most popular potted plants in the horticultural market because of the colorful and long-lasting flowers. In Phalaenopsis, interspecific hybridization between sections or subgenera has long been used for breeding cultivars with novel traits. Considering the diverse genome size and karyomorphology in Phalaenopsis species used in breeding, a study of genome size and chromosome composition would be crucial to provide fundamental knowledge for Phalaenopsis breeding. In this study, we characterized the chromosome composition of 60 representative Phalaenopsis cultivars of various colors and types commonly used in breeding programs. Our genome size analyses indicated that calculating the ploidy of Phalaenopsis cultivars based on their C-value data is difficult because of the diverse genome sizes of the parental species and different genome introgression of the parental species used for hybrids. Most Phalaenopsis cultivars are polyploid, and a few cultivars possess hyperand hypoploid chromosome numbers. Analysis of chromosome composition of these cultivars suggested that the occurrence of unreduced gametes played a significant role in polyploidization of Phalaenopsis cultivars during breeding. Chromosomal data also demonstrated different chromosome introgression of parental species in novelty and harlequin types of cultivars. The genome size and chromosomal data provided in this study are important for breeders to assist in planning efficient Phalaenopsis breeding programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据