From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices
出版年份 2019 全文链接
标题
From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices
作者
关键词
-
出版物
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2019-12-16
DOI
10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Designing a Value-Driven Future for Ethical Autonomous and Intelligent Systems
- (2019) Greg Adamson et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE
- In defense of the black box
- (2019) Elizabeth A. Holm SCIENCE
- Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data: Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation
- (2018) Bernd Carsten Stahl et al. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY
- What Can Political Philosophy Teach Us about Algorithmic Fairness?
- (2018) Reuben Binns IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY
- Enslaving the Algorithm: From a “Right to an Explanation” to a “Right to Better Decisions”?
- (2018) Lilian Edwards et al. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY
- The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism
- (2018) Julia Dressel et al. Science Advances
- A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models
- (2018) Riccardo Guidotti et al. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
- How AI can be a force for good:
- (2018) Mariarosaria Taddeo et al. SCIENCE
- AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
- (2018) Luciano Floridi et al. MINDS AND MACHINES
- Soft ethics, the governance of the digital and the General Data Protection Regulation
- (2018) Luciano Floridi PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
- Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges
- (2018) Corinne Cath PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
- The fallacy of inscrutability
- (2018) Joshua A. Kroll PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
- The Logic of Design as a Conceptual Logic of Information
- (2017) Luciano Floridi MINDS AND MACHINES
- Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach
- (2017) Corinne Cath et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Toward Ethical Information Systems: The Contribution of Discourse Ethics
- (2017) Mingers et al. MIS QUARTERLY
- There is a blind spot in AI research
- (2016) Kate Crawford et al. NATURE
- Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions
- (2016) Luciano Floridi PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
- What is data ethics?
- (2016) Luciano Floridi et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
- Tolerant Paternalism: Pro-ethical Design as a Resolution of the Dilemma of Toleration
- (2015) Luciano Floridi SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Practical verification of decision-making in agent-based autonomous systems
- (2014) Louise A. Dennis et al. Automated Software Engineering
- Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis
- (2014) Alexander Hevelke et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- A systematic methodology for privacy impact assessments: a design science approach
- (2013) Marie Caroline Oetzel et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Ethics and OR: Operationalising discourse ethics
- (2010) John Mingers EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
- Moral Responsibility, Technology, and Experiences of the Tragic: From Kierkegaard to Offshore Engineering
- (2010) Mark Coeckelbergh SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started