4.5 Article

A regulated synthetic operon facilitates stable overexpression of multigene terpenoid pathway in Bacillus subtilis

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-019-02257-4

关键词

Bacillus subtilis; MEP; Carotenoids; Cell factory; Stability

资金

  1. EU [EU FP-7 Grant 289540 (PROMYSE), NWO-ALW 855.01.161] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Erasmus Mundus [Strand 1, Fatima Al Fihri project ALFI1200161 scholarship, Action 2] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen [Bernoulli scholarship] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The creation of microbial cell factories for sustainable production of natural products is important for medical and industrial applications. This requires stable expression of biosynthetic pathways in a host organism with favorable fermentation properties such as Bacillus subtilis. The aim of this study is to construct B. subtilis strains that produce valuable terpenoid compounds by overexpressing the innate methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway. A synthetic operon allowing the concerted and regulated expression of multiple genes was developed. Up to 8 genes have been combined in this operon and a stably inherited plasmid-based vector was constructed resulting in a high production of C-30 carotenoids. For this, two vectors were examined, one with rolling circle replication and another with theta replication. Theta-replication constructs were clearly superior in structural and segregational stability compared to rolling circle constructs. A strain overexpressing all eight genes of the MEP pathway on a theta-replicating plasmid clearly produced the highest level of carotenoids. The level of transcription for each gene in the operon was similar as RT-qPCR analysis indicated. Hence, that corresponding strain can be used as a stable cell factory for production of terpenoids. This is the first report of merging and stably expressing this large-size operon (eight genes) from a plasmid-based system in B. subtilis enabling high C-30 carotenoid production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据