JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY

期刊名
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY

J IND MICROBIOL BIOT

ISSN / eISSN
1367-5435 / 1476-5535
目标和范围
The Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology is an international journal which publishes papers describing original research, short communications, and critical reviews in the fields of biotechnology, fermentation and cell culture, biocatalysis, environmental microbiology, natural products discovery and biosynthesis, marine natural products, metabolic engineering, genomics, bioinformatics, food microbiology, and other areas of applied microbiology
研究方向

生物工程与应用微生物

CiteScore
8.70 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Medicine - General Medicine Q1 #69/830
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY - SCIE Q2
H-index
97
出版国家或地区
GERMANY
出版商
Springer International Publishing
出版周期
Monthly
出版年份
1986
年文章数
30
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D-69121
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
The first review was quick, returning in less than 20 days. There were two reviewers, one in favor and one against. The editor requested revisions, and I responded seriously to the revisions. The second review took two months, and the editor provided rejection comments. Upon reviewing the feedback, both reviewers, including the one who initially opposed, agreed. However, a third reviewer appeared and provided ambiguous comments. Surprisingly, a fourth reviewer also emerged, claiming that I did not make changes according to the third reviewer's comments and criticized my attitude and dedication. As a result, they raised some sharp questions and opposed publication. Finally, the editor rejected the manuscript. This situation is absurd. The initial review comments I received did not mention the third reviewer, so how should I respond? How can I take it seriously and modify it according to their requirements? It is evident that a quick first review is not a good thing. The editor sent me the manuscript for revision after receiving two opinions. Later, I showed both the revised version and the newly received comments from the third person to the fourth reviewer. The fourth reviewer mistakenly believed that I did not make changes according to the third person's comments, which influenced their evaluation. Therefore, the entire situation is a result of the chaos in the editorial department of the journal. If there were initially three opinions, the editorial department could have directly rejected the manuscript, saving us two months. However, if given the opportunity for major revisions, we are confident in effectively addressing the comments of all three reviewers.
2022-10-12
I don't know if it's just me or the situation I encountered, but the reviewing process after submission is quite fast. However, the submission process is a bit slow. Basically, it takes more than a month for each "with editor" round. I don't know if it's due to the impact of the pandemic or what's going on.
2021-12-20

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More