4.5 Article

Enhanced nitrogen removal of low C/N wastewater using a novel microbial fuel cell (MFC) with Cupriavidus sp. S1 as a biocathode catalyst (BCS1)

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6309

关键词

microbial fuel cell; Cupriavidus sp; S1; biocathode; nitrogen removal; bioelectrochemical denitrification

资金

  1. Program for National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778397, 21776196]
  2. Innovative Projects for Post-graduate Education of Shanxi Province [2017BY063]
  3. International Cooperation Projects of Shanxi Province [201603D421040]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0600502]
  5. Key Research and Development Plan of Shanxi Province [201603D321010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND An innovative microbial fuel cell (MFC) using Cupriavidus sp. S1 as the biocathode catalyst was developed to improve nitrogen removal from low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) wastewater. RESULTS The desirable external resistance was 100 omega in this study, with an optimal total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency of 95.71%, and a maximum current density and power density of 7583.89 +/- 318.11 mA m(-3) and 932 mW m(-3) at C/N = 2, respectively, which initially confirmed the ability of Cupriavidus sp. S1 to obtain electrons from the electrode. The maximum tolerance of the system at R-ext of 100 omega was C/N = 1, with a TN removal efficiency of 90.87%. Compared with the open circuit, the TN removal increased by approximately 21.60% and 52.02% at C/N = 2 and 1, respectively, which expanded the application area for the dominant denitrifying bacteria S1. Additionally, the system exhibits the obvious merits of less sludge production, low energy consumption and the recovery of some energy. CONCLUSION Based on these results, domesticated Cupriavidus sp. S1 possesses electrochemical activity. Thus, the system has great potential for efficient and cost-effective nitrogen removal from nitrate-containing low C/N wastewater and energy recovery. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据