4.6 Article

Electrochemical properties of asymmetric supercapacitor based on optimized carbon-based nickel-cobalt-manganese ternary hydroxide and sulphur-doped carbonized iron-polyaniline electrodes

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 334, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135610

关键词

Activated expanded graphite (AEG); Floating test; Sulphur-doped carbonized iron PANI (CFPS); Electrochemical properties; Energy density

资金

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa [61056]
  3. University of Pretoria
  4. National Research Foundation (NRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes a modified low temperature gel-method for production of low cost mixed-metal hydroxides/carbon composites electrode materials via a simple and cost-effective stirring technique. A ternary metal hydroxide of nickel, cobalt, and manganese (NiCoMn-TH) combined with activated expanded graphite (AEG) as composite electrode material (NiCoMn-TH/AEG) provided a maximum specific capacity of 116.81 mAh g(-1) at a specific current of 0.5 A g(-1), measured in a three-electrode configuration in 1 M KOH aqueous electrolyte. Electrochemical measurements of the NiCoMn-TH/AEG composite material and a sulphur-doped carbonized iron PANI (CFP-S) negative electrode assembled as an asymmetric supercapacitor (SC), delivered a high energy density of 23.5 Wh kg(-1) corresponding to a power density of 427 W kg(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1). Interestingly, the assembled asymmetric SC, NiCoMn-TH/ AEG//CFP-S gained about 68.4% of its initial specific capacitance corresponding to an energy density of -31.8 Wh kg(-1) resulting in a power density of 530.1 W kg(-1) over a floating test of 120 h at a specific current of 1 A g(-1). These excellent results suggest that this composite material possesses satisfactory potential for high efficient electrode for supercapacitor applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据