4.6 Article

Template-free synthesis of platinum hollow-opened structures in deep-eutectic solvents and their enhanced performance for methanol electrooxidation

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 337, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135742

关键词

Deep eutectic solvents; Hollow-opened structures; Platinum nanoparticles; Electrocatalyst; Methanol oxidation reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21463007, 21573240]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2017GXNSFDA198031, 2016GXNSFAA380199, 2014GXNSFFA118003]
  3. BAGUI Scholar Program [2014A001]
  4. Project of Talents Highland of Guangxi Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a novel non-aqueous green solvent that can deem to be the optimal substitution of conventional solvents and ionic liquids, deep-eutectic solvents (DESs) have attracted significant attention from academia and industry in terms of chemical synthesis in recent years. Herein, we report the highly effective preparation of Pt nanoparticles with hollow-opened structures (Pt HOSs) as an efficient electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) via a facile template-free solvothermal synthesis in DESs. The as-obtained Pt HOSs are consisted of well assembled secondary and tertiary branches, which can remarkably improve the utilization efficiency and electrocatalytic activity of Pt via promoting the access of electroactive species to the full-extent Pt surface. In this regard, the as-prepared Pt HOSs possess higher electrochemically active surface areas (ECSAs) and show improved electrochemical properties for MOR. Furthermore, the Pt HOSs retain a higher reactivity after the long-term testing compared with commercial Pt black, suggesting that they have enhanced electrocatalytic durability. In specific, the rational design of Pt HOSs in DESs may enrich the synthetic strategies for producing more electrocatalysts with impressive activity and stability. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据