4.2 Article

Solubility and Diffusivity of Oxygen in Ionic Liquids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
卷 64, 期 11, 页码 4956-4967

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00750

关键词

-

资金

  1. Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing NA, Inc.
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [F-1945]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solubility of O-2 was measured gravimetrically in 16 ionic liquids (ILs) containing piperidinium, pyrrolidinium, ammonium, tetrahydrothiophenium, methyltriazabicyclodecene, or guanidinium cations paired with bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, bis(perfluoroethylsulfonyl)imide, or perfluoropropanoyl(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide anions. The temperature dependence of the solubility was determined for eight of the ILs. Henry law constants were determined from the solubility data as well as standard enthalpies and entropies of absorption for systems with temperature-dependent data. Knowledge of these thermodynamic properties is essential in guiding the structural design of ionic liquids for different applications involving O-2. The O-2 solubility did not follow any obvious trend with regard to IL structure or molar volume; instead, the dipole-quadrupole interactions are the primary driving forces for O-2 dissolution in ionic liquids, as demonstrated by negative standard enthalpies of absorption for all of the ILs. In addition, diffusion coefficients of O-2 in the ILs as a function of temperature (293, 313, and 333 K) and applied O-2 pressure (1, 3, and 5 MPa) were obtained by fitting the time-dependent absorption data to a widely used mass diffusion model. The diffusion coefficients of O-2 in ionic liquids at 293 K and 1 MPa roughly correlate inversely with the pure IL viscosity, likely due to the relatively low and similar O-2 solubilities under these conditions. As expected, O-2 diffusivities increase with increasing temperature. However, they also increase with increasing pressure, likely due to decreasing solution viscosity with increasing gas solubility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据