4.8 Article

Tailored and biodegradable poly(2-oxazoline) microbeads as 3D matrices for stem cell culture in regenerative therapies

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 1-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.045

关键词

Poly(2-oxazoline); Microbeads; Microfluidics; Biodegradable; Stem cells

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FZ 111]
  2. Cluster of Excellence Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD) Seed Grant program
  3. National Institutes of Health through the National Cancer Institute Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer [UO1 CA151806]
  4. Excellence Initiative by the German Federal and State Governments (Institutional Strategy, measure support the best)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the synthesis of hydrogel microbeads based on telechelic poly(2-oxazoline) (POx) cross-linkers and the methacrylate monomers (HEMA, METAC, SPMA) by inverse emulsion polymerization. While in batch experiments only irregular and ill-defined beads were obtained, the preparation in a microfluidic (MF) device resulted in highly defined hydrogel microbeads. Variation of the MF parameters allowed to control the microbead diameter from 50 to 500 mu m. Microbead elasticity could be tuned from 2 to 20 kPa by the POx:monomer composition, the POx chain length, net charge of the hydrogel introduced via the monomer as well as by the organic content of the aqueous phase. The proliferations of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) on the microbeads were studied. While neutral, hydrophilic POx-PHEMA beads were bioinert, excessive colonization of hMSCs on charged POx-PMETAC and POx-PSPMA was observed. The number of proliferated cells scaled roughly linear with the METAC or SPMA comonomer content. Additional collagen I coating further improved the stem cell proliferation. Finally, a first POx-based system for the preparation of biodegradable hydrogel microcarriers is described and evaluated for stem cell culturing. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据