4.5 Review

Using Xenopus oocytes in neurological disease drug discovery

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 39-52

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1682993

关键词

Xenopus oocytes; neurological diseases; electrophysiology; patch clamping; ion channels; chronic pain; CIPN; Alzheimer; ALS

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 CA208623]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1827656]
  3. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1827656] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Neurological diseases present a difficult challenge in drug discovery. Many of the current treatments have limited efficiency or result in a variety of debilitating side effects. The search of new therapies is of a paramount importance, since the number of patients that require a better treatment is growing rapidly. As an in vitro model, Xenopus oocytes provide the drug developer with many distinct advantages, including size, durability, and efficiency in exogenous protein expression. However, there is an increasing need to refine the recent breakthroughs. Areas covered: This review covers the usage and recent advancements of Xenopus oocytes for drug discovery in neurological diseases from expression and functional measurement techniques to current applications in Alzheimer's disease, painful neuropathies, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The existing limitations of Xenopus oocytes in drug discovery are also discussed. Expert opinion: With the rise of aging population and neurological disorders, Xenopus oocytes, will continue to play an important role in understanding the mechanism of the disease, identification and validation of novel molecular targets, and drug screening, providing high-quality data despite the technical limitations. With further advances in oocytes-related techniques toward an accurate modeling of the disease, the diagnostics and treatment of neuropathologies will be becoming increasing personalized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据